PC's IDE controller 投稿者：Michealteand 投稿日：2019/06/10(Mon) 12:30 No.417723 
I own stock in Sony dufus. I know what a loading screen is, I was just saying that Sims3 had loading where you couldn't do anything (hence the car example). Is normal what is not normal is that they fail in a few months which didn't happen with the PS2 as you never prove it,you proved after years DRE happen which is normal. Weak damage control lemming. Man stop just because you want to play it like it is not big news doesn't mean it is not. . Mapping the rewind and forward buttons to the triggers is just stupid, as it insures those buttons will be pressed unintentionally when the controller is put down. The entire conceit of the game is that you can die 2, 3, 4 times before you are actually dead, which means you can potentially take far more hits that you would even in the soulsborne games. . that is what I am going with. Browse Boards I use an old Corsair TX850W PSU. I see the collector's value and how strongly people feel about having to 'own' something. . You're a moron. The difference in this case is popularity. Dead with my game development dreams ;___; I just find cinema more interesting. Alright sure, lets go with half-assed then. 05/22/19 11:00 AM EDT. Loading Video. Trust me. Eh, maybe you're not a flight enthusiast. GTX 1060 shreds games @ 1080p. was of high quality. i'm pretty happy with the performance. 2GB DVD9 i think. Buncha snowflakes, I tell you what. Quality and sales. ,Not really. really,I really liked it. That's only one example. https://cyberia.plati.market/games/napoleon-total-war/224?lang=en-USNo. But people want to find a way to bash the X1X. I notice no PS4 comparison... window.amzn_assoc_link_style="color:#262626;" Uh... that's a stretch, considering Sony is getting reputation for being an "SJW company" ever since they moved their HQ from Japan to California. Your off you trolly Same for me. I guess so because no one else did. lol I'll claim Bloodborne can be played on PC and no other hardware by the user, and as such it no longer fits the English definition of Exclusive.These are both irrefutable facts.You are going to run into several problems next gen if you can't accept these facts.,The "Only on Playstation" gives them an out. PSNow is still under the Playstation name.,I could be wrong, but I think we saw "Sony exclusive" on this board first, due to remasters across gens. Like I said, i'm definitely not certain.,I'm literally just quoting Oxford and Merriam-Webster, you troglodytes.@joshrmeyer said: @zaryia: As I just said, by your definition of exclusive, all games that are BC are no longer exclusive then. That's moronic. Xbox 360 exclusives can be played on Xbox One now. They are still Xbox 360 exclusives. Same with any BC game.Games that are on both XB1 and XBOX360 aren't total exclusives, they are Microsoft Exclusives. That's been a thing for a while.Yes and each one gives a definition which states that something is confined or restricted by an entity for specific use which Bloodborne is exactly that. You can only play it the way Sony and their Playstation brand want you to because they own and operate all aspects of how its played and where. This is counter to something like Gears of War where Epic can allow the game to be published, accessed, or purchased without Microsoft's consent. Sony Playstation completely controls all access to play this game. There is no scenario where you are not required to work with Sony to access the game (legally). ,According to both definitions BB is no longer Exclusive.exclusiveadjectiveexп?cluп?sive | ik-?sklu-siv , -zivDefinition of exclusive(Entry 1 of 2)1a: excluding or having power to excludeb: limiting or limited to possession, control, or use by a single individual or group2a: excluding others from participationb: snobbishly aloof3a: accepting or soliciting only a socially restricted patronage (as of the upper class)b: STYLISH, FASHIONABLEc: restricted in distribution, use, or appeal because of expense4a: SINGLE, SOLEexclusive jurisdictionb: WHOLE, UNDIVIDEDhis exclusive attentionexclusivehttps://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/exclusive1Excluding or not admitting other things.?an exclusive focus on success and making money??the list is not exclusive?More example sentencesSynonyms1.1 Unable to exist or be true if something else exists or is true.?mutually exclusive options?More example sentencesSynonyms1.2 (of terms) excluding all but what is specified.Example sentencesSynonyms2Restricted to the person, group, or area concerned.?the couple had exclusive possession of the flat??the problem isn't exclusive to Dublin?More example sentencesSynonyms2.1 (of an item or story) not published or broadcast elsewhere.?an exclusive interview?More example sentences2.2 (of a commodity) not obtainable elsewhere.It is no longer excluded from PC. It is no longer limited to a single system (PS4). It is no longer excluded from participation for PC gamers. It is no longer restricted from use.,We've never used the industry's changing standards for exclusives. It's on one system, and that's it. Archaic rules, but rules nonetheless.We actually used to do polls in order to change meanings, but SW has no sort of structure anymore, and is just a giant pisspot.,Yes, they had to rebrand to MS Exclusives.With Streaming, Sony will have to rebrand whenever they see fit. If they ever decide to, I doubt they will they are usually stingy with that.However, branding and marketing is subjective and doesn't change reality. I can play BB on my PC. It factually isn't exclusive.This will carry on to next gen.,PC>>>>>>>>>>>>>Sony, reCloud.,I see you've accepted PS4 is 2nd place this gen.,Do you want to debate or just ad-hom spam. Like perhaps find a dictionary entry that shows I'm wrong.P.S. So will Stadia Exclusives count as PC Exclusives?,As soon as you show me Oxford Dictionary and Webster's Dictionary are wrong, you won. Heh. Till then, you kinda got rocked by me. All I had to do is quote dictionaries and quote Sony's PC page for PS NOW. Easy Peasy. PC can play BB (SONY). BB is no longer Exclusive (Oxford/MW).P.S. So will Stadia Exclusives count as PC Exclusives?P.S.S. Why are you so bad at debating? reCloud this must be 40:0. Remember that time you couldn't count GS's score tally and PC came out +100, and you cried?,You have two kinds of "exclusives" in the industry. Exclusives built on technical grounds and those built on business grounds. It is entirely possible to have exclusives based on a combination of the two. For instance, Bloodborne would be both a technical exclusives because the game is designed and built to only run on PS4 hardware execution models. It is also a business decision to keep it this way. This is different than something like FF14 where it was exclusive to the PS3 + PC, then expanded to the PS4. However it was kept as a console "Playstation exclusive" for business reason. In development you need to design and code a game to run natively on another platform/hardware for it to be considered crossplatform. In marketing, Exclusives can be either console/platform, brand, or market sector i.e. console brand exclusive but not PC exclusive. That's what the usage makes no sense in this forum because the game itself is defined by every single entity a involved as "exclusive" and technically meets many many of the different industry definitions of that. This is no "not-exclusive" definition beyond the game not meeting any of the criteria to be considered any type of exclusive in the industry.,That whole post isn't relevant to this board. We all understand the definitions, but that doesn't mean they hold weight here. That much should be obvious... SW operates by a whole different set of arbitrary rules. ,You have two kinds of "exclusives" in the industry. Exclusives built on technical grounds and those built on business grounds. It is entirely possible to have exclusives based on a combination of the two. For instance, Bloodborne would be both a technical exclusives because the game is designed and built to only run on PS4 hardware execution models. It is also a business decision to keep it this way. This is different than something like FF14 where it was exclusive to the PS3 + PC, then expanded to the PS4. However it was kept as a console "Playstation exclusive" for business reason. In development you need to design and code a game to run natively on another platform/hardware for it to be considered crossplatform. In marketing, Exclusives can be either console/platform, brand, or market sector i.e. console brand exclusive but not PC exclusive. That's what the usage makes no sense in this forum because the game itself is defined by every single entity a involved as "exclusive" and technically meets many many of the different industry definitions of that. This is no "not-exclusive" definition beyond the game not meeting any of the criteria to be considered any type of exclusive in the industry.BB is not exclusive. I can play it on my PC. Times are changing. This is going to become even more problematic next gen with Stadia Exclusives that require zero hardware to buy, you won't know what to call them with your dated wiki entries rather than actual English.,That whole post isn't relevant to this board. We all understand the definitions, but that doesn't mean they hold weight here. That much should be obvious... SW operates by a whole different set of arbitrary rules.Then that's a problem with the board itself. How can this be a videogame board which doesn't respect industry standards of basic terms. Its doing a disservice to itself and the industry by misinforming others about information pertaining to the industry and ultimately does more harm than good as a place to discuss those topics. If a forum decided that the sky was purple, does that mean all other evidence should be ignored or should that information be corrected? ,It's a subset called System Wars bud. Arbitrary rules apply. If you don't like it, then you don't have to post here.,That whole post isn't relevant to this board. We all understand the definitions, but that doesn't mean they hold weight here. That much should be obvious... SW operates by a whole different set of arbitrary rules.Then that's a problem with the board itself. How can this be a videogame board which doesn't respect industry standards of basic terms. Its doing a disservice to itself and the industry by misinforming others about information pertaining to the industry and ultimately does more harm than good as a place to discuss those topics. If a forum decided that the sky was purple, does that mean all other evidence should be ignored or should that information be corrected?But it's a changing industry. Sooner or later some games will be streamed only via software (Stadia Exclusives), at that point are you going to pretend they don't exist as playable video games? You seem to be stuck on some old lol wiki entry.,That whole post isn't relevant to this board. We all understand the definitions, but that doesn't mean they hold weight here. That much should be obvious... SW operates by a whole different set of arbitrary rules.Then that's a problem with the board itself. How can this be a videogame board which doesn't respect industry standards of basic terms. Its doing a disservice to itself and the industry by misinforming others about information pertaining to the industry and ultimately does more harm than good as a place to discuss those topics. If a forum decided that the sky was purple, does that mean all other evidence should be ignored or should that information be corrected?But it's a changing industry. Sooner or later some games will be streamed only via software (Stadia Exclusives), at that point are you going to pretend they don't exist as playable video games? You seem to be stuck on some old lol wiki entry.You?re right, no sense in debating in discussion that aren?t based on logic, reason, or actually evidence. It?s my bad for assuming something like that would occur here.,SW works on its own set of rules. That's the way it goes. By-and-large, it's fairly well reasoned, but exclusives are strictly on one platform.,The hard proof is the fact the game can be played on PC.It objectively isn't exclusive. Definitions and facts matter. Facts > Feelings. Are you really this dense?!?!?!?!?!?!Yea, he's really that dense. He's a complete moron.I've given up trying to reason with him, he clearly has an IQ in the single digits. Anyone who claims to own a PS4 and pays for PS Now to stream PS4 games at 720p with input lag when remote play is already available free for the system is clearly a moron ??,There's a Survival Guide in the stickies. There was strict adherence to the rules prior, but it's become more lenient. Hence the semi-awareness of "PS Exclusive," "MS Exclusive," "Nintendo Exclusive." As it is, most of SW tends to abide by the one system rule. You certainly don't have to, but people may not acknowledge your opinion.,There's a Survival Guide in the stickies. There was strict adherence to the rules prior, but it's become more lenient. Hence the semi-awareness of "PS Exclusive," "MS Exclusive," "Nintendo Exclusive." As it is, most of SW tends to abide by the one system rule. You certainly don't have to, but people may not acknowledge your opinion.Yikes! there was a weighted score and everything! This is absurd I didnt even realized there was sanctioned namecalling and trolling.. Anyway this is from the official thread.Q: Has the definition of 'exclusive' changed?Again, it depends.Look, one of the reasons the metagame was scrapped was because of its rigidity and inflexibility in trying to apply onestandard even where it may not fit. Absolute exclusivity, which the old metagame favored, is still the gold standard, of course. But it is no longer viable in the present day marketplace. Absolute exclusives really don' exist- even first party games are often shared with PCs and smartphones sometimes, now.So what definition of exclusives are we using? That will depend on the context of the discussion, and that's the beauty of it. Calling Street Fighter V a PS4 exclusive in context of a PS4 vs Xbox One discussion is perfectly acceptable, as is calling ReCore an Xbox One exclusive. Discussing the value of soft exclusives like these in the context of the larger market is a discussion that is now welcomed, rather than before, where it was against the metagame, and therefore invalid.Of course, an absolute exclusive is still the best, because no one can really argue against it- but soft exclusives are no longer grounds for derailed discussions or dismissal.So it seems according to GameSpots SW rules it would be considered an exclusive albeit soft exclusive they are still exclusives based on the rules of the forum.,Yeah I?m not, both the industry, the developers/publishers, and the very forum you are posting in as per the SW guidelines state that it would be considered an exclusive. I?ll read the terms of service of System Wars to see what the standard course of action is.,But according to the rules of the forum the definition changed. Even ignoring that there?s an industry standard which seems the rules of SW were changed to reflect that. There?s simply no basis for using that outdated and SW exclusive definition when not even SW supports that definition anymore. Like you said those are the rules of the forum and who ever doesn?t like it doesn?t have to post here.,Read what I said above. You can use that terminology, but there is zero obligation for others to do so. It's exactly the same with you... Use that terminology. Jump to Top 2 GameSpot Giveaways Do you have an S? I didn't know you live in Toronto! Yeah, I'll say that it was worth Toronto to trade Demar DeRozen for the Top Elite that is Kawhi Leonard. It's now a matter of getting into the finals. The rising elite Giannis vs the veteran will be an interesting match. But my gut is telling me that we may see Kevin Durant vs Kawhi Leonard in the NBA Finals, as 2 of the top 3 elites in the NBA Sure, PlayStation Nation 1 Ouch! Jump to Last Read GameSpot Giveaways
|
